Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

"Was that successful?" on Integrating Proactive Meta-Dialogue in a DIY-Assistant using Multimodal Cues

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Kraus, Matthias
Schiller, Marvin
Behnke, Gregor
Bercher, Pascal
Dorna, Michael
Dambier, Michael
Glimm, Birte
Biundo, Susanne
Minker, Wolfgang

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Abstract

Effectively supporting novices during performance of complex tasks, e.g. do-it-yourself (DIY) projects, requires intelligent assistants to be more than mere instructors. In order to be accepted as a competent and trustworthy cooperation partner, they need to be able to actively participate in the project and engage in helpful conversations with users when assistance is necessary. Therefore, a new proactive version of the DIY-assistant Robert is presented in this paper. It extends the previous prototype by including the capability to initiate reflective meta-dialogues using multimodal cues. Two different strategies for reflective dialogue are implemented: A progress-based strategy initiates a reflective dialogue about previous experience with the assistance for encouraging the self-appraisal of the user. An activity-based strategy is applied for providing timely, task-dependent support. Therefore, user activities with a connected drill driver are tracked that trigger dialogues in order to reflect on the current task and to prevent task failure. An experimental study comparing the proactive assistant against the baseline version shows that proactive meta-dialogue is able to build user trust significantly better than a solely reactive system. Besides, the results provide interesting insights for the development of proactive dialogue assistants.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads

abcd