Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Features of effective primary health care models in rural and remote Australia: a case-study analysis

dc.contributor.authorWakerman, John
dc.contributor.authorHumphreys, John
dc.contributor.authorWells, Robert
dc.contributor.authorKuipers, Pim
dc.contributor.authorJones, Judith A
dc.contributor.authorEntwistle, Philip
dc.contributor.authorKinsman, Leigh D
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:57:14Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:36:22Z
dc.description.abstractObjective: To describe the factors and processes that facilitate or inhibit implementation, sustainability and generalisation of effective models of primary health care (PHC) service delivery in rural and remote Australia. Design: Case-study approach, including review of relevant literature, interviews with key informants, site visits and direct observation. Thematic analysis and template analysis were used with interview transcripts. An expert reference group provided feedback and advice on policy relevance. Setting and participants: Six PHC services in small communities across rural and remote Australia were selected based on results of a previous systematic review; they reflected diverse rural and remote settings and PHC models, and the multidisciplinary nature of PHC. Sites were visited, and 55 individuals associated with the establishment and operation of these services were interviewed between July 2006 and December 2007. Results: Independent and template analysis confirmed the usefulness of a conceptual framework, which identified three key "environmental enablers" - supportive policy; federal and state/territory relations; and community readiness - and five essential service requirements - governance, management and leadership; funding; linkages; infrastructure; and workforce supply. Systematically addressing each of these factors improves effectiveness and lessens the threat to service sustainability. Conclusions: Evidence from existing effective rural and remote PHC services can inform the health care reform agenda, in Australia and other countries. The evidence highlights the need for improved governance, management and community involvement, as well as strong, visionary political leadership to achieve a more responsive and better coordinated health system which could help eliminate existing health status differentials between cities and rural areas. In Australia, establishment of a single national health system, operationalised at a regional level, would obviate much of the current inefficiency and poor coordination.
dc.identifier.issn0025-729X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/60567
dc.publisherAustralasian Medical Association
dc.sourceMedical Journal of Australia
dc.subjectKeywords: article; Australia; community care; funding; government; health care policy; health service; interview; leadership; medical service; primary health care; rural area; organization and management; rural health care; theoretical model; Australia; Interviews
dc.titleFeatures of effective primary health care models in rural and remote Australia: a case-study analysis
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage91
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage88
local.contributor.affiliationWakerman, John, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationHumphreys, John, Monash University
local.contributor.affiliationWells, Robert, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationKuipers, Pim, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationJones, Judith A, Monash University
local.contributor.affiliationEntwistle, Philip, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationKinsman, Leigh D, Monash University
local.contributor.authoruidWells, Robert, u4165686
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111717 - Primary Health Care
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4105084xPUB548
local.identifier.citationvolume191
local.identifier.doi10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02700.x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-70349320103
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Wakerman_Features_of_effective_primary_2009.pdf
Size:
158.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format