Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Framing the islands: knowledge and power in changing Australian images of 'the South Pacific'

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Fry, Greg

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

A new and powerful set of images of the South Pacific, and of Pacific islanders, has recently come to prominence within Australia. The images are embedded in a forthright salvationist message which warns of an approaching 'doomsday' or 'nightmare' unless Pacific islanders remake themselves - just as Australians have had to do. This 'new doomsdayism' forms part of a longstanding Australian practice of 'framing' Pacific island peoples in three senses: firstly, of drawing geographical boundaries around them for purposes of making generalisations; secondly, of intending to shape the lives of the people so bounded; and thirdly, in the colloquial sense, of setting them up for outcomes not of their making. This paper explores how we should judge the exercise of power inherent in this latest Australian representation of the Pacific Islands; in particular, whether it marks a departure from the subordinating knowledge associated with the 'smallness' notion of the Cold War years. The paper argues that, while the new doomsdayism's images of the region and of the potentialities of its inhabitants might at first sight appear to mark such a departure, the underlying preconceptions continue the subordination inherent in the development and security discourses of the Cold War era.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description