ANU Open Research Repository has been upgraded. We are still working on a few minor issues, which may result in short outages throughout the day. Please get in touch with repository.admin@anu.edu.au if you experience any issues.
 

Transdimensional tomography with unknown data noise

Date

2012

Authors

Bodin, Thomas
Sambridge, Malcolm
Rawlinson, Nicholas
Arroucau, Pierre

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Abstract

A meaningful interpretation of seismic measurements requires a rigorous quantification of the uncertainty. In an inverse problem, the data noise determines how accurately observations should be fit, and ultimately the level of detail contained in the recovered model. A common problem in seismic tomography is the difficulty in quantifying data uncertainties, and thus the required level of data fit. Traditionally, the complexity of the solution model (defined by both the number of basis functions and the regularization) is defined arbitrarily by the user prior to inversion with only limited use of data errors. In the context of multiscale problems, dealing with multiple data sets that are characterized by different noise variances and that span the Earth at different scales is a major challenge. Practitioners are usually required to arbitrarily weigh the contribution of each data type into the final solution. Furthermore, the basis functions are usually spatially uniform across the velocity field and regularization procedures are global, which prevents the solution model from accounting for the uneven spatial distribution of information. In this work we propose to address these issues with a Hierarchical Bayesian inversion. The new algorithm represents an extension of the transdimensional tomography to account for uncertainties in data noise. This approach has the advantage of treating the level of noise in each data set, as well as the number of model parameters, as unknowns in the inversion. It provides a parsimonious solution that fully represents the degree of knowledge one has about seismic structure (i.e. constraints, resolution and trade-offs). Rather than being forced to make decisions on parametrization, level of data fit and weights between data types in advance, as is often the case in an optimization framework, these choices are relaxed and instead constrained by the data themselves. The new methodology is presented in a synthetic example where both the data density and the underlying structure contain multiple length scales. Three ambient noise data sets that span the Australian continent at different scales are then simultaneously inverted to infer a multiscale tomographic image of Rayleigh wave group velocity for the Australian continent. The procedure turns out to be particularly useful when dealing with multiple data types with different unknown levels of noise as the algorithm is able to naturally adjust the fit to the different data sets and provide a velocity map with a spatial resolution adapted to the spatially variable information present in the data.

Description

Keywords

Keywords: Ambient noise; Basis functions; Common problems; Data density; Data errors; Data fits; Data noise; Data sets; Data type; Data uncertainty; Degree-of-knowledge; Different scale; Free oscillation; Hierarchical bayesian; Length scale; Level of detail; Model Inverse theory; Probability distributions; Surface waves and free oscillations; Seismic tomography; Computational seismology; Australia

Citation

Source

Geophysical Journal International

Type

Journal article

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05414.x

Restricted until