Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Transfer Issues and Directions for Reform: Australian Transfer Policy in Comparative Perspective

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Whiteford, Peter

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Melbourne

Abstract

Tax-transfer systems in developed countries balance a range of competing objectives, including 'poverty alleviation' and redistribution to the poor, and protection more broadly against a range of social risks, either through redistribution across the life-cycle or social insurance. In seeking to balance these objectives, governments are concerned to maximise policy effectiveness and to minimise adverse outcomes in relation to incentives to work or save or to form or dissolve families or households, while also guaranteeing the long-term sustainability of the system. This paper provides a background and a framework for considering key transfer policy issues in Australia. The paper places the Australian system of social transfers in an international comparative perspective, identifying the distinctive design features and outcomes of Australian arrangements, as well as the similarities between Australian arrangements and those in other countries. The paper also discusses the distributional profile of Australian transfers compared to those in other OECD countries, and assesses the efficiency and effectiveness of the Australian system in terms of�poverty reduction�and impacts on income inequality. The paper also discusses interpersonal and intrapersonal redistribution and updates previous�comparative analysis�of the extent of 'churning' and middle class welfare?(Whiteford, 2006).

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Melbourne Institute – Australia’s Future Tax and Transfer Policy Conference: Proceedings of a Conference

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2099-12-31