A checklist for trauma quality improvement meetings: A process improvement study
Date
Authors
O'Reilly, Gerard M.
Mathew, Joseph
Roy, Nobhojit
Gupta, Amit
Joshipura, Manjul
Sharma, Naveen
Mitra, Biswadev
Cameron, Peter A
Fahey, Madonna
Howard, T
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Abstract
Background: Each year approximately five million people die from injuries. In countries where systems
of trauma care have been introduced, death and disability have decreased. A major component of developed trauma systems is a trauma quality improvement (TQI) program and trauma quality improvement
meeting (TQIM). Effective TQIMs improve trauma care by identifying and fixing problems. But globally,
TQIMs are absent or unstructured in most hospitals providing trauma care. The aim of this study was to
implement and evaluate a checklist for a structured TQIM.
Methods: This project was conducted as a prospective before-and-after study in four major trauma centres in India. The intervention was the introduction of a structured TQIM using a checklist, introduced
with a workshop. This workshop was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) TQI Programs
short course and resources, plus the developed TQIM checklist. Pre- and post-intervention data collection occurred at all meetings in which cases of trauma death were discussed. The primary outcome was
TQIM Checklist compliance, defined by the discussion of, and agreement upon each of the following: preventability of death, identification of opportunities to improve care and corrective actions and a plan for
closing the loop.
Results: There were 34 meetings in each phase, with 99 cases brought to the pre-intervention phase
and 125 cases brought to the post-intervention phase. There was an increase in the proportion of cases
brought to the meeting for which preventability of death was discussed (from 94% to 100%, p = 0.007)
and agreed (from 7 to 19%, OR 3.7; 95% CI:1.4–9.4, p = 0.004) and for which a plan for closing the loop
was discussed (from 2% to 18%, OR 10.9; 95% CI:2.5–47.6, p < 0.001) and agreed (from 2% to 18%, OR 10.9;
95% CI:2.5–47.6, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study developed, implemented and evaluated a TQIM Checklist for improving TQIM processes. The introduction of a TQIM Checklist, with training, into four Indian trauma centres, led to more
structured TQIMs, including increased discussion and agreement on preventability of death and plans for
loop closure. A TQIM Checklist should be considered for all centres managing trauma patients.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Injury: international journal of the care of the injured
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31