Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Planning for the persistence of river biodiversity: exploring alternative futures using process-based models

dc.contributor.authorTurak, Eren
dc.contributor.authorFerrier, Simon
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Tom W
dc.contributor.authorMesley, Edwina
dc.contributor.authorDrielsma, Michael
dc.contributor.authorManion, Glenn
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Gavin
dc.contributor.authorStein, Janet
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Geoff
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:59:44Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:52:09Z
dc.description.abstract1. Planning for the conservation of river biodiversity must involve a wide range of management options and account for the complication that the effects of many actions are spatially removed from these actions. Reserve design algorithms widely used in conservation planning today are not well equipped to address such complexities.2. We used process-based models to estimate the expected persistence of river biodiversity under alternative catchment-wide management scenarios and applied it in the Hunter Region (37 000 km2) in southeastern Australia.3. The biological condition of 12197 subcatchments was estimated using a multiple linear regression model that related assessments of the integrity of macroinvertebrate assemblages to human-induced disturbances at river sites. The best-fit model (R2=0.76) used measures of both local and catchment-wide disturbances as well as elevation and distance from source as predictor variables. Based on the outputs of this model, we estimated that substantial loss of river biodiversity had occurred in some parts of the coastal fringes and the lower parts of the larger river systems. The most affected river type was small, low-gradient streams.4. The predicted biodiversity condition together with river types based on macroinvertebrate assemblages and abiotic attributes was used to estimate a biodiversity persistence index (BDI).5. A priority value for each subcatchment was calculated for different actions by changing the disturbance values for that subcatchment and calculating the resulting marginal change in regional BDI. Maps were thereby created for three different types of priority: catchment protection priority, catchment restoration priority and river section conservation priority.6. The subcatchments of high catchment protection priority for river biodiversity were mostly in the uplands and within protected areas. The river sections of high conservation priority included many coastal lowland rivers in and around protected areas as well as many upland headwater streams. Subcatchments of high priority for catchment restoration were mostly in coastal areas or lowland floodplains.7. This approach may be particularly well suited to guide the integrated implementation of three place-based protection strategies proposed for freshwaters: focal areas, critical management zones and catchment management zones.
dc.identifier.issn0046-5070
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/61231
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceFreshwater Biology
dc.subjectKeywords: Conservation planning; Persistence; Rivers; Scenario modelling
dc.titlePlanning for the persistence of river biodiversity: exploring alternative futures using process-based models
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage18
local.contributor.affiliationTurak, Eren, Commonwealth Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
local.contributor.affiliationFerrier, Simon, CSIRO Entomology
local.contributor.affiliationBarrett, Tom W., NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change
local.contributor.affiliationMesley, Edwina, NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
local.contributor.affiliationDrielsma, Michael, NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Waters
local.contributor.affiliationManion, Glenn, NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
local.contributor.affiliationDoyle, Gavin, Hunter-Central Rivers CMA
local.contributor.affiliationStein, Janet, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationGordon, Geoff, NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
local.contributor.authoruidStein, Janet, u8812935
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor050202 - Conservation and Biodiversity
local.identifier.absseo960506 - Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Fresh, Ground and Surface Water Environments
local.identifier.absseo960807 - Fresh, Ground and Surface Water Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4279067xPUB596
local.identifier.citationvolumeonline 17 FEB 2010
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02394.x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-78650021245
local.identifier.thomsonID000285301600004
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Turak_Planning_for_the_persistence_2010.pdf
Size:
3.89 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format