Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorKelly, Matthewen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPeungson, Janyaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorChokkanapitak, Jaruwanen_AU
dc.contributor.authorVilainerun, Duangkaeen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSeubsman, Sam-angen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSleigh, Adrianen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-01T04:49:35Z
dc.date.available2015-12-01T04:49:35Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-27
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T11:08:18Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Ensuring successful follow-up is essential when conducting a prospective cohort study. Most existing literature reviewing methods to ensure a high response rate is based on experience in developed nations. FINDINGS We report our 4-year follow-up success for a national cohort study examining the health transition underway in Thailand. We began the cohort study in 2005 with a baseline postal questionnaire sent to all 200,000 Thais enrolled as distance learning students at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University and residing all over Thailand; 87,134 or 44% of the students responded. Subsequently we used University and national media to inform cohort members of study progress. Also, we prepared a health book with study results and health advice which was distributed to all cohort members. After 4 years we repeated the survey and achieved a 71% response rate. In this paper we report the methods used to achieve this responseThe initial follow-up mail-out generated a response rate of about 48% reflecting the extensive preparatory work between baseline and follow-up. After 4 rounds of telephone contact (more than 100,000 phone calls) and 4 related mail-out rounds progressively over 16 months an overall response rate was achieved of just over 71% (n = 60,774). The total cost was US$4.06/respondent - 19% for printing, 21% for postage, 14% for tape measures (included in mail-out), 18% for data processing 22% for prizes and 6% for telephone. CONCLUSIONS Many of the methods reported as effective for mail questionnaire and cohort response rates held true for Thailand. These included being associated with a university, incentivating cooperation, follow-up contact, providing a second copy of questionnaire where necessary, and assurance of confidentiality. Telephone contact with the cohort and the small prizes given to responders were particularly important in the Thai context as was Thai leadership of the research team.
dc.identifier.issn1756-0500en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/16930
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/268055
dc.rights© 2011 Kelly et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.sourceBMC Research Notes
dc.subjectKeywords: Thais
dc.titleMethods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage166en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSeubsman, Sam-ang, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE Research School of Population Health, Natl Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKelly, Matthew, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE Research School of Population Health, Natl Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSleigh, Adrian, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE Research School of Population Health, Natl Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPuengson, Janya, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChokkanapitak, Jaruwan, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationVilainerun, Duangkae, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailanden_AU
local.contributor.authoruidSeubsman, Sam-ang, u4590939en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor160807en_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4468094xPUB184en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume4en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1186/1756-0500-4-166en_AU
local.identifier.essn1756-0500en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-79959728314
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Seubsman_Methods_used_for_successful_2011.pdf
Size:
1.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: