Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Compositional data analysis for elemental data in forensic science

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Gareth P.
dc.contributor.authorCurran, James M.
dc.contributor.authorMiskelly, Gordon M.
dc.contributor.authorCoulson, Sally
dc.contributor.authorYaxley, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorGrunsky, Eric C.
dc.contributor.authorCox, Simon C.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T21:53:51Z
dc.date.available2015-12-10T21:53:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:28:30Z
dc.description.abstractDiscrimination of material based on elemental composition was achieved within a compositional data (CoDa) analysis framework in a form appropriate for use in forensic science. The methods were carried out on example data from New Zealand nephrite. We have achieved good separation of the in situ outcrops of nephrite from within a well-defined area. The most significant achievement of working within the CoDa analysis framework is that the implications of the constraints on the data are acknowledged and dealt with, not ignored. The full composition was reduced based on collinearity of elements, principal components analysis (PCA) and scalings from a backwards linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Thus, a descriptive subcomposition was used for the final discrimination, using LDA, and proved to be more successful than using the full composition. The classification based on the LDA model showed a mean error rate of 2.9% when validated using a 10 repeat, three-fold cross-validation. The methods presented lend objectivity to the process of interpretation, rather than relying on subjective pattern matching type approaches.
dc.identifier.issn0379-0738
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/38686
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceForensic Science International
dc.subjectKeywords: analytic method; article; data analysis; discriminant analysis; forensic science; principal component analysis; priority journal; validation process Compositional data analysis; Forensic science; ICP-MS; Nephrite
dc.titleCompositional data analysis for elemental data in forensic science
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage90
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage81
local.contributor.affiliationCampbell, Gareth P., University of Auckland
local.contributor.affiliationCurran, James M., University of Auckland
local.contributor.affiliationMiskelly, Gordon M., University of Auckland
local.contributor.affiliationCoulson, Sally, Environmental Science and Research, ESR
local.contributor.affiliationYaxley, Gregory, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationGrunsky, Eric C., Geological Survey of Canada
local.contributor.affiliationCox, Simon C., GNS Science
local.contributor.authoruidYaxley, Gregory, u4039347
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor010403 - Forensic Statistics
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4027924xPUB165
local.identifier.citationvolume188
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.018
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-67349214093
local.identifier.thomsonID000267239000012
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads