Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Indonesia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Mietzner, Marcus

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

Indonesia provides an illuminating example of a political finance regime whose most important feature is its habitual abuse. The illusion of an effective regulatory regime is a facade behind which parties and candidates collect almost limitless donations and turn to oligarchs to get involved in their political parties: this is particular acute after the effective deregulation of political parties with the huge reduction in state subsidies to party headquarters introduced in 2005. This reduction in public subsidies was accompanied by a tightening of disclosure rules on the use of public subsidies and donations, although these reforms have not managed to curb corruption. The oligarchization in the top tiers of political parties has increased. Moreover, politicians are increasingly diverting state resources to fund their private political operations and provide benefits to voters. Poor implementation can render a sophisticated regulatory regime useless and perpetuate traditional patronage and rent-seeking behaviors.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Checkbook Elections? Political Finance in Comparative Perspective

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31