Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts

dc.contributor.authorGleeson, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorLexchin, Joel
dc.contributor.authorLabonté, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorTownsend, Belinda
dc.contributor.authorGagnon, Marc-André
dc.contributor.authorKohler, Jillian
dc.contributor.authorForman, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorShadlen, Kenneth C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T01:38:26Z
dc.date.available2020-09-03T01:38:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2020-05-17T08:20:16Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Trade and investment agreements negotiated after the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) have included increasingly elevated protection of intellectual property rights along with an expanding array of rules impacting many aspects of pharmaceutical policy. Despite the large body of literature on intellectual property and access to affordable medicines, the ways in which other provisions in trade agreements can affect pharmaceutical policy and, in turn, access to medicines have been little studied. There is a need for an analytical framework covering the full range of provisions, pathways, and potential impacts, on which to base future health and human rights impact assessment and research. A framework exploring the ways in which trade and investment agreements may affect pharmaceutical policy was developed, based on an analysis of four recently negotiated regional trade agreements. First a set of core pharmaceutical policy objectives based on international consensus was identified. A systematic comparative analysis of the publicly available legal texts of the four agreements was undertaken, and the potential impacts of the provisions in these agreements on the core pharmaceutical policy objectives were traced through an analysis of possible pathways. Results: An analytical framework is presented, linking ten types of provisions in the four trade agreements to potential impacts on four core pharmaceutical policy objectives (access and affordability; safety, efficacy, and quality; rational use of medicines; and local production capacity and health security) via various pathways. Conclusions: The analytical framework highlights provisions in trade and investment agreements that need to be examined, pathways that should be explored, and potential impacts that should be taken into consideration with respect to pharmaceutical policy. This may serve as a useful checklist or template for health and human rights impact assessments and research on the implications of trade agreements for pharmaceuticals.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1744-8603en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/209276
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenance© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_AU
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_AU
dc.rights© The Author(s).en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceGlobalization and Healthen_AU
dc.titleAnalyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impactsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage17en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGleeson, Deborah, La Trobe Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLexchin, Joel, York Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLabonté, Ronald, University of Ottawaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTownsend, Belinda, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGagnon, Marc-André, Carleton Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKohler, Jillian, University of Torontoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationForman, Lisa, University of Torontoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationShadlen, Kenneth C., London School of Economics and Political Scienceen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidTownsend, Belinda, u1040233en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor111799 - Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absfor160510 - Public Policyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo929999 - Health not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absseo920407 - Health Protection and/or Disaster Responseen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB10969en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume15en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1186/s12992-019-0518-2en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.globalizationandhealth.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Gleeson_Analyzing_the_impact_of_trade_2019.pdf
Size:
586.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format