Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Spatial and temporal variability of fragmentation effects in a long term, eucalypt forest fragmentation experiment

dc.contributor.authorKing, Andrew J
dc.contributor.authorMelbourne, Brett A.
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Kendi F
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, Anthony O
dc.contributor.authorAustin, Michael P.
dc.contributor.authorTuff, Kika T
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Maldwyn
dc.contributor.authorHardy, Chris M
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Saul
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-05T22:22:05Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T11:54:40Z
dc.description.abstractContext: Although forest fragmentation is generally thought to impact tree growth and mortality negatively, recent work suggests some forests are resilient. Experimental forests provide an opportunity to examine the timing and extent of forest tree resilience to disturbance from fragmentation. Objectives: We used the Wog Wog Habitat Fragmentation Experiment in southeastern Australia to test Eucalyptus growth and survivorship responses to forest fragmentation over a 26 year period. Methods: We measured 2418 tree diameters and used spline-regression techniques to examine non-monotonic fragmentation effect over two time periods. Results: Over the first 4 years after fragmentation, individual eucalypt tree growth was greater than in continuous forest for large trees and mortality rates were higher only within 10 m of edges. Over the following 22 years only the effects on tree growth remained and on average all fragments rebounded so that their biomass and mortality rates were equivalent to continuous forest. Importantly non-monotonic patterns were observed in growth and mortality with respect to area and distance from edge in both study periods, demonstrating that fragmentation impacts on trees can be strong in localized areas (greatest in 3 ha fragments and 0–30 m edges) and over short time periods. Conclusions: Dry-sclerophyll eucalypt forests join the set of forest types that display resilient growth dynamics post fragmentation. Moreover, persistent non-monotonic impacts on tree growth with respect to tree size, fragment area, and fragment distance from edge, highlighting landscape fragmentation as a driver of habitat heterogeneity within remnant forest fragments.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organisation, and a National Science Foundation grant DEB 0841892 to KD and BM.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/254504
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersen_AU
dc.rights© Crown 2018en_AU
dc.sourceLandscape Ecologyen_AU
dc.subjectFragmentation experimenten_AU
dc.subjectTree growthen_AU
dc.subjectEucalyptusen_AU
dc.subjectPine plantationen_AU
dc.titleSpatial and temporal variability of fragmentation effects in a long term, eucalypt forest fragmentation experimenten_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage623en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage609en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKing, Andrew J, King Ecological Consultingen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMelbourne, Brett A., University of Coloradoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDavies, Kendi F, University of Coloradoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNicholls , Anthony O, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciencesen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAustin, Michael P., CSIROen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTuff, Kika T, University of Colorado Bouldeen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationEvans, Maldwyn, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHardy, Chris M, CSIRO Wildlife and Ecologyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCunningham, Saul, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidEvans, Maldwyn, u4796571en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidCunningham, Saul, u4593341en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor059999 - Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absfor040699 - Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absfor060799 - Plant Biology not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB9587en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume33en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-018-0623-2en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85044091391
local.publisher.urlhttps://link.springer.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_King_Spatial_and_temporal_2018.pdf
Size:
1.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format