Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

An adaptive, automatic multiple-case deletion technique for detecting influence in regression

dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Steven
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Letian
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:43:22Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.updated2015-12-07T11:17:37Z
dc.description.abstractCritical to any regression analysis is the identification of observations that exert a strong influence on the fitted regression model. Traditional regression influence statistics such as Cook's distance and DFFITS, each based on deleting single observations, can fail in the presence of multiple influential observations if these influential observations "mask" one another, or if other effects such as "swamping" occur. Masking refers to the situation where an observation reveals itself as influential only after one or more other observations are deleted. Swamping occurs when points that are not actually outliers/influential are declared to be so because of the effects on the model of other unusual observations. One computationally expensive solution to these problems is the use of influence statistics that delete multiple rather than single observations. In this article, we build on previous work to produce a computationally feasible algorithm for detecting an unknown number of influential observations in the presence of masking. An important difference between our proposed algorithm and existing methods is that we focus on the data that remain after observations are deleted, rather than on the deleted observations themselves. Further, our approach uses a novel confirmatory step designed to provide a secondary assessment of identified observations. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
dc.identifier.issn0040-1706
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/24983
dc.publisherAmerican Statistical Association
dc.sourceTechnometrics
dc.titleAn adaptive, automatic multiple-case deletion technique for detecting influence in regression
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage40
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationRoberts, Steven, College of Business and Economics, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationZheng, Letian, Commomwealth Bank of Australia
local.contributor.affiliationMartin, Michael, College of Business and Economics, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidRoberts, Steven, u3031871
local.contributor.authoruidMartin, Michael, u8517524
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor010401 - Applied Statistics
local.identifier.absseo930201 - Pedagogy
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5260803xPUB35
local.identifier.citationvolumeEarly Online Version
local.identifier.doi10.1080/00401706.2014.946152
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84939621189
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Roberts_An_adaptive,_automatic_2014.pdf
Size:
534.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format