Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Children's conceptualization of the term 'satisfaction': relevance for measuring health outcomes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Phillips (previously Taylor), Rebecca
Olds, Tim
Boshoff, Kobie
Lanes, Alison E.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract

Background: Health outcomes measurement is integral to planning and evaluating paediatric health care. Recent outcome measures have been developed to capture children's participation in everyday activities, a core component of which is the child's perceived satisfaction. Satisfaction, however, is a complex concept and it is not known how children conceptualize satisfaction and hence how it should best be measured. The purpose of this study was to explore children's conceptualization of the term 'satisfaction' and compare this with the description of satisfaction given in the literature to inform how satisfaction can be assessed in children. Methods: Forty children aged between 10 and 15 years participated in eight focus groups, guided by a descriptive qualitative approach, to describe how they conceptualize 'satisfaction'. Children with disabilities were excluded as it was considered important to first ascertain how children without disabilities conceptualize satisfaction. Recruitment occurred through seven urban and rural public schools. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Participants identified three methods by which a person may determine their level of satisfaction (i) making comparisons with previous experiences, and other's and self-expectations; (ii) evaluating one's emotions; and (iii) receiving positive external feedback. Participants described drawing upon one of these methods in isolation, rather than integrating outcomes from each method into one judgement of satisfaction. Participants also demonstrated confusion between the terms 'satisfaction' and 'satisfactory'. Conclusions: Partial congruence between children's conceptualization of satisfaction and that reported in the literature was observed in this study. Not all children between the ages of 10 and 15, however, have a full understanding of satisfaction. Caution must therefore be taken when using the term satisfaction in children's assessments to minimize the potential for varying interpretations of the question. Further studies are required to explore how children with disabilities view the term satisfaction and if their understanding differs to that of typically developing children.

Description

Citation

Source

Child: Care, Health and Development

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31
abcd