Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in the forests of south-east Queensland, Australia

dc.contributor.authorParris, Kirstem M
dc.contributor.authorNorton, Tony Wallace
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Ross
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:24:01Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T23:24:01Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T09:18:55Z
dc.description.abstractWe employed three techniques for sampling amphibians (nocturnal stream searching, pitfall traps with drift fences, and automatic tape recording of anuran calls) concurrently for six nights at 20 forest sites in south-east Queensland, Australia, to compare their performance. Nocturnal stream searching was the most sensitive sampling technique, detecting the most species with the fewest nights of survey. Pitfall trapping was the least sensitive sampling technique. On average, a minimum of four nights of survey was required to detect the range of amphibian species present at a site. Nocturnal stream searches and automatic tape recorders were robust in the range of conditions encountered during the survey, with no significant relationships found between temporal or spatial variation in their performance and weather or site conditions. This systematic study represents one of few to compare different techniques for sampling amphibians in a given region, and the first such study to compare automatic tape recording of anuran calls with other, more traditional sampling techniques.
dc.identifier.issn0018-0831
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/92038
dc.publisherEast Tennessee University
dc.sourceHerpetologica
dc.subjectKeywords: amphibian; sampling; Australia Amphibians; Australia; Forests; Frogs; Monitoring; Sampling techniques; Survey
dc.titleA comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in the forests of south-east Queensland, Australia
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage283
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage271
local.contributor.affiliationParris, Kirstem M, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationNorton, Tony, University of Tasmania
local.contributor.affiliationCunningham, Ross, Administrative Division, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidCunningham, Ross, u8200457
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor050211 - Wildlife and Habitat Management
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub23006
local.identifier.citationvolume55
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-0032844141
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads