Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Declarations of independence

dc.contributor.authorFitelson, Branden
dc.contributor.authorHajek, Alan
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-10T04:15:55Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-02
dc.date.updated2019-04-21T08:31:33Z
dc.description.abstractAccording to orthodox (Kolmogorovian) probability theory, conditional probabilities are by definition certain ratios of unconditional probabilities. As a result, orthodox conditional probabilities are regarded as undefined whenever their antecedents have zero unconditional probability. This has important ramifications for the notion of probabilistic independence. Traditionally, independence is defined in terms of unconditional probabilities (the factorization of the relevant joint unconditional probabilities). Various “equivalent” formulations of independence can be given using conditional probabilities. But these “equivalences” break down if conditional probabilities are permitted to have conditions with zero unconditional probability. We reconsider probabilistic independence in this more general setting. We argue that a less orthodox but more general (Popperian) theory of conditional probability should be used, and that much of the conventional wisdom about probabilistic independence needs to be rethought.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0039-7857en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/173673
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing AGen_AU
dc.rights© 2014 Springer Science+Business Mediaen_AU
dc.sourceSyntheseen_AU
dc.subjectConditional probabilityen_AU
dc.subjectIndependenceen_AU
dc.subjectPopperen_AU
dc.subjectConfirmationen_AU
dc.titleDeclarations of independenceen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-09-09
local.bibliographicCitation.issue10en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationFitelson, Branden, Rutgers Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHajek, Alan, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidHajek, Alan, u4237626en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor220206 - History and Philosophy of Science (incl. Non-historical Philosophy of Science)en_AU
local.identifier.absseo970122 - Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studiesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4485658xPUB980en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume194en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s11229-014-0559-2en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84907652811
local.identifier.thomsonID000414996500013
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Fitelson-Hájek2017_Article_DeclarationsOfIndependence.pdf
Size:
408.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: