Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Australian general practitioners' attitudes and knowledge of sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma management

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Watts, Caroline G
Smith, Andrea L.
Robinson, Sam
Chang, Chiao-Han (Sharon)
Goumas, Chris
Schmid, Helen
Kelly, John
Hong, Angela
Scolyer, Richard
Long, Georgina V

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

Abstract

Background and objectives In Australia, the uptake of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) appears low despite clinical practice guideline recommendations. The aim of this study was to describe the knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) to SLNB. Methods GPs were recruited at an annual conference and a skin cancer skills workshop, and using GP professional communications. A mixed methods approach comprised a cross-sectional questionnaire and, for a subset of participants, semi-structured interviews. Results Overall, 231 GPs completed the questionnaire, of whom 23 were interviewed. One-third (32%) described themselves as quite or very familiar with the guidelines, and two-thirds (68%) thought that SLNB had an important role in the management of patients with melanoma. Of GPs who would discuss SLNB with eligible patients, <40% correctly identified that SLNB is recommended for patients with an invasive melanoma >1 mm thick. Discussion GPs were generally supportive of SLNB. Familiarity with the guidelines was low, particularly regarding which patients should be considered for SLNB.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Australian Journal of General Practice

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31