Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Hegemony, not anarchy: why China and Japan are not balancing US unipolar power

dc.contributor.authorVan Ness, Peteren_AU
dc.date.accessioned2003-09-05en_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-19T17:46:33Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:51:17Z
dc.date.available2004-05-19T17:46:33Zen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:51:17Z
dc.date.created2001en_AU
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T07:50:28Z
dc.description.abstractThe United States today dominates the globe and many regional geographical sub-systems in an unprecedented way, maintaining a hegemonic order that is in no way similar to the ‘anarchy’ assumed in realist analyses. The global system today is not simply unipolar; it is a hegemonic system that is increasingly globalised, in which the basic concepts of realism (anarchy, self-help and power-balancing) provide little guidance or understanding in explaining state behaviour. This essay describes the US hegemonic system, analyses the roles of China and Japan within that system, and examines how the Bush administration’s plans for missile defence might transform that system. There are critical implications from this analysis for realist interpretations of international politics.en_AU
dc.format.extent296210 bytes
dc.format.extent349 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-482X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/41723en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/41723
dc.language.isoen_AUen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_AU
dc.sourceInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific
dc.subjectunipolar power
dc.subjectanarchy
dc.subjecthegemonic system
dc.subjectmissile defence
dc.subjectinternational politics
dc.subjecthyperpower
dc.subjectrealism
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectJapan
dc.titleHegemony, not anarchy: why China and Japan are not balancing US unipolar power
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paper
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage150
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage131
local.citationWorking papers 2001/4en_US
local.contributor.affiliationDepartment of International Relations, RSPASen_US
local.contributor.affiliationANUen_US
local.contributor.authoruidVan Ness, Peter, u4026593
local.description.refereedyesen_US
local.identifier.absfor160607 - International Relations
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub2999
local.identifier.citationmonthdecen_US
local.identifier.citationvolume2
local.identifier.citationyear2001en_US
local.identifier.eprintid1931en_US
local.rights.ispublishedyesen_US
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01-4.pdf
Size:
289.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format