Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Doha Merchandise Trade Reform: What Is at Stake for Developing Countries?

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Kymen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-06T02:05:04Z
dc.date.available2016-07-06T02:05:04Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractThe LINKAGE model of the global economy and the latest Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) database (version 6.05) are used to examine the impact of current merchandise trade barriers and agricultural subsidies and possible reform outcomes of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO’s) Doha Development Agenda. The results suggest that moving to free global merchandise trade would boost real incomes in Sub-Saharan Africa proportionately more than in other developing countries or in high-income countries, despite the terms of trade loss in parts of that region. Particular attention is given to agriculture, as farmers constitute the poorest households in developing countries but the most assisted in rich countries. Net farm incomes would rise substantially in Sub-Saharan Africa and other developing country regions, alleviating rural poverty. Partial liberalization could move the world some way toward those desirable outcomes, the more so the more developing countries themselves cut applied tariffs, particularly on agricultural imports.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are grateful for funding from the U.K. Department for International Development.en_AU
dc.format27 pagesen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0258-6770en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/105696
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_AU
dc.rights© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK.en_AU
dc.sourceThe World Bank Economic Reviewen_AU
dc.subjectLINKAGEen_AU
dc.subjectmodelen_AU
dc.subjectglobalen_AU
dc.subjecteconomyen_AU
dc.subjectGlobal Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)en_AU
dc.subjecttradeen_AU
dc.subjectbarriersen_AU
dc.subjectmerchandiseen_AU
dc.subjectagriculturalen_AU
dc.subjectsubsidiesen_AU
dc.subjectreformen_AU
dc.subjectWTOen_AU
dc.subjectDoha Development Agendaen_AU
dc.subjectfreeen_AU
dc.subjectrealen_AU
dc.subjectincomesen_AU
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africaen_AU
dc.subjectdevelopingen_AU
dc.subjectcountriesen_AU
dc.titleDoha Merchandise Trade Reform: What Is at Stake for Developing Countries?en_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage195en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage169en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAnderson, Kym, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, CAP Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu4042848en_AU
local.description.notesAt the time of publication Kym Anderson was affiliated with the World Bank.en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume20en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1093/wber/lhj009en_AU
local.identifier.essn1564-698Xen_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.oxfordjournals.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: