Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Co-phonology vs. Indexed constraint theory: a case study of Perak dialect partial reduplication

dc.contributor.authorSyed Jaafar, Sharifah Raihan
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-17T01:38:02Z
dc.date.available2012-07-17T01:38:02Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-01
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents co-phonologies and indexed constraint theory developed within Optimality theory (Prince and Smolensky, 1993) to account for partial reduplication in Perak dialect of Malay. It is found that the dialect has two patterns of reduplicative morphemes, i.e. light and heavy reduplication. In the co-phonology developed by Orgun (1996), Antilla (2002), Inkelas and Zoll (2005, 2007) and many others, each morphological construction is associated with a different phonological grammar, and the idea of ‘Markedness Reversal’, where a markedness constraint can be re-ranked in different morphological constructions in the same language, is used to account for morphologically conditioned phonology. In indexed constraint theory on the other hand, one constraint ranking is used to define the grammar of the entire language (cf. Alderrete,1999, 2001; Itô and Mester, 1999, 2003). Unlike co-phonology, this theory handles morphologically-conditioned phonology cases by splitting the phonology constraints into a particular morphological context, which results in different indexed versions, such as MAX-CROOT, MAX-CAFFIX and so forth (Ibid.). In the analysis, I will demonstrate how the ideas proposed in both theories can handle light and heavy reduplication. The results of the analysis favour co-phonology rather than indexed constraint theory, as the former offers a better account of morphologically conditioned phonology.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian National Universityen_AU
dc.format10 pagesen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1836-6821
dc.identifier.otherISO 639-3 Language codes: zlm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/9146
dc.publisherAsia-Pacific Linguisticsen_AU
dc.rights"Copyright vested in the author; released under Creative Commons Attribution Licence" - at head of journal articleen_AU
dc.sourceJournal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (JSEALS) 5 (2012): 97-106en_AU
dc.subjectreduplicationen_AU
dc.subjectphonologyen_AU
dc.subjectoptimality theoryen_AU
dc.titleCo-phonology vs. Indexed constraint theory: a case study of Perak dialect partial reduplicationen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-11-03
local.contributor.affiliationSyed Jaafar, Sharifah Raihan, National University of Malaysia, School of Language Studies and Linguistics
local.publisher.urlhttp://pacling.anu.edu.au/en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.jseals.org
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SyedJaafar_Cophonology2012.pdf
Size:
246.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
68 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: