Compositional Data in Neuroscience: If You've Got It, Log It!
Loading...
Date
Authors
Smith, Paul F.
Renner, Ross
Haslett, Stephen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Abstract
Background
Compositional data sum to a constant value, for example, 100%. In neuroscience, such data are common, for example, when estimating the percentage of time spent for a behavioural response in a limited choice situation or a neurochemical within brain tissue. Compositional data have a distinct structure which complicates analysis and makes inappropriate standard statistical analyses such as general linear model analyses and principal components or factor analysis (whether Q-mode or R-mode), as a result of the correlation of the components, the dependence of the pairwise covariance on which other components are included in the analysis, and the bounded nature of the data.
New method
This problem has been recognised in disciplines such as geology and zoology for decades, where log ratio methods have been successfully applied. The isometric log ratio (ilr) method has some particular advantages.
Comparison with existing method
Classical statistical methods such as t-tests, ANOVAs, and multivariate analyses are invalid when applied to compositional data.
Conclusions
The compositional data analysis methods developed by statisticians and used by geologists and zoologists should be considered for compositional data analysis in neuroscience.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31
Downloads
File
Description