An assessment of statistical methods for nonindependent data in ecological meta-analyses: Comment
Loading...
Date
Authors
Nakagawa, Shinichi
Senior, Alistair
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
Noble, Daniel WA
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ecological Society of America
Abstract
Recently, Song et al. (2020) conducted a simulation study using different methods to deal with non-independence resulting from effect sizes originating from the same paper – a common occurrence in ecological meta-analyses. The main methods that were of interest in their simulations were: 1) a standard random-effects model used in combination with a weighted average effect size for each paper (i.e., a two-step method), 2) a standard random-effects model after randomly choosing one effect size per paper, 3) a multilevel (hierarchical) meta-analysis model, modelling paper identity as a random factor, and 4) a meta-analysis making use of a robust variance estimation method. Based on their simulation results, they recommend that meta-analysts should either use the two-step method, which involves taking a weighted paper mean followed by analysis with a random-effects model, or the robust variance estimation method.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Ecology
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
2099-12-31