An assessment of statistical methods for nonindependent data in ecological meta-analyses: Comment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Nakagawa, Shinichi
Senior, Alistair
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
Noble, Daniel WA

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ecological Society of America

Abstract

Recently, Song et al. (2020) conducted a simulation study using different methods to deal with non-independence resulting from effect sizes originating from the same paper – a common occurrence in ecological meta-analyses. The main methods that were of interest in their simulations were: 1) a standard random-effects model used in combination with a weighted average effect size for each paper (i.e., a two-step method), 2) a standard random-effects model after randomly choosing one effect size per paper, 3) a multilevel (hierarchical) meta-analysis model, modelling paper identity as a random factor, and 4) a meta-analysis making use of a robust variance estimation method. Based on their simulation results, they recommend that meta-analysts should either use the two-step method, which involves taking a weighted paper mean followed by analysis with a random-effects model, or the robust variance estimation method.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Ecology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31