Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Assessing the risk of domestic violence recidivism

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Fitzgerald, Robin
Graham, Timothy

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Abstract

Aim: To determine what factors independently predict violent DV-related re-offending among a cohort of people convicted of a(ny) DV offence and given a non-custodial penalty. Method: Data from the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR) Reoffending Database were used to examine violent DV-related reconviction. A cohort of DV offenders convicted in 2011-12 was first identified using domestic violence lawpart codes, and followed up for two years. To identify the best fitting model we first examined bi-variate relationships between explanatory variables and the dependent variable. We then estimated a multivariate logistic regression model to determine which variables independently predicted reconviction. Finally, we tested the predictive validity of the model using a range of cross-validation strategies. Results: Among the cohort of adult offenders (n = 14,660), 8% were reconvicted of a violent DV-related offence within two years of the index conviction. Eleven explanatory variables were found to best predict reconviction – representing offender demographic, index offence, and criminal history characteristics. The resulting model showed acceptable levels of predictive validity. Conclusion: To the extent that they direct appropriate interventions, risk assessment tools could be one part of a more complete community safety strategy aimed at violent DV recidivism. Limitations of the current study are discussed.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Crime and Justice Bulletin

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until