Green Lawfare: Does the Evidence Match the Allegations? - An Empirical Evaluation of Public Interest Litigation under the EPBC Act from 2009 to 2019
Loading...
Date
Authors
Reynolds, Annika
Ray, Andrew
O'Connor, Shelby
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Law Book Company
Abstract
The alleged rise of tactical litigation by public interest groups challenging decisions made under the Envirionment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act) has been used to justify calls by government and interest groups to repeal the extended standing provisions contained in the Act. These calls, however, have not been supported by empirical analysis to date. This article builds on existing research to determine whether tactical lawfare is being used to disrupt and delay development projects in Australia. It concludes that there is no evidence of lawfare by environmental groups, and that reducing the wider standing afforded under the EPBC Act is not justified by the objectives of the Act, or key international environmental agreements.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Environmental and Planning Law Journal
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
2099-12-31
Downloads
File
Description