Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Green Lawfare: Does the Evidence Match the Allegations? - An Empirical Evaluation of Public Interest Litigation under the EPBC Act from 2009 to 2019

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Reynolds, Annika
Ray, Andrew
O'Connor, Shelby

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Law Book Company

Abstract

The alleged rise of tactical litigation by public interest groups challenging decisions made under the Envirionment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act) has been used to justify calls by government and interest groups to repeal the extended standing provisions contained in the Act. These calls, however, have not been supported by empirical analysis to date. This article builds on existing research to determine whether tactical lawfare is being used to disrupt and delay development projects in Australia. It concludes that there is no evidence of lawfare by environmental groups, and that reducing the wider standing afforded under the EPBC Act is not justified by the objectives of the Act, or key international environmental agreements.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Environmental and Planning Law Journal

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads