Open Research will be updating the system on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, from 8:15 to 9:00 AM. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Ecology and taxonomy-driven deviations in the frog call-body size relationship across the diverse Australian frog fauna

dc.contributor.authorHoskin, Conrad
dc.contributor.authorJames, S.
dc.contributor.authorGrigg, G.C.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T12:05:10Z
dc.description.abstractRelationships between some properties of frog calls and body size are widely recognized. However, generality across call components and diverse faunas, and sources of deviation, remain poorly tested. Using 116 east Australian frog species, we tested the relationship between three call traits and body size, and the effects of taxonomic family and calling habitat. Call dominant frequency (DF) has a highly significant negative relationship with size, whereas call duration and pulse rate do not. Frog families show the same slope of relationship between DF and size, but hylids call at significantly higher frequency relative to size. Within hylids, stream breeders call at significantly lower DF than pool breeders of comparable size - below the DF of stream noise in typical breeding habitat - a shift likely to enhance signal detection against background environmental noise. This contrasts with all previous observations from other regions that frogs call at high (even ultrasonic) frequency to avoid masking by stream noise.
dc.identifier.issn0952-8369
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/58004
dc.publisherZoological Society of London
dc.sourceJournal of Zoology
dc.subjectKeywords: body size; breeding; calling behavior; dominance; frog; taxonomy; Anura; Hylidae; Myobatrachidae Body size; Dominant frequency; Environmental noise; Frog call; Signal evolution; Stream habitat
dc.titleEcology and taxonomy-driven deviations in the frog call-body size relationship across the diverse Australian frog fauna
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage41
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage36
local.contributor.affiliationHoskin, Conrad, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationJames, S., University of Queensland
local.contributor.affiliationGrigg, G.C., University of Queensland
local.contributor.authoruidHoskin, Conrad, u4463788
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor060809 - Vertebrate Biology
local.identifier.absfor060303 - Biological Adaptation
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9511635xPUB423
local.identifier.citationvolume278
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00550.x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-65249104090
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Hoskin_Ecology_and_taxonomy-driven_2009.pdf
Size:
193.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd