Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Are kea prosocial?

dc.contributor.authorHeaney, Megan
dc.contributor.authorBastos, Amalia P. M.
dc.contributor.authorGray, Russell D
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Alex H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T04:33:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.date.updated2020-07-06T08:27:57Z
dc.description.abstractProsocial behaviour is widespread in humans, but evidence for its occurrence in other species is mixed. We presented a parrot species, the kea (Nestor notabilis) with a series of experiments to test whether they exhibit prosocial tendencies. Across the first round of testing, in our first condition, two of the four kea acted prosocially, as they preferred to choose a prosocial token which rewarded both themselves and a partner, rather than a token that rewarded only themselves. Three of the four kea then showed a preference for the prosocial token in a second condition where they alternated taking turns with a partner. However, no kea showed a decrease in the third yoked control condition in which the experimenter replicated the token choice made by the partner in the previous alternating trials. This yoked condition was used to dissociate truly reciprocal behaviour, whereby the actor made choices based on their partner's choices, from a response to the amount of rewards conferred to the partner. Finally, three of the four kea continued to choose the prosocial token in the fourth asocial control condition where no partner was present. However, in round two of testing, one kea changed its token choices to a similar pattern to that expected if kea are prosocial, in that it preferred the prosocial token in the initial condition, showed a trend for the prosocial token when turns were alternated, but chose at chance in the yoked and asocial conditions. This study therefore found no evidence of spontaneous reciprocity in kea but further testing is required before we can conclude that kea are not capable of prosocial behaviour at all.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by a University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship (MH), a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship (AHT) and a Prime Minister's McDiarmid Emerging Scientist Prize (AHT).en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.citationHeaney M, Bastos APM, Gray RD, Taylor AH. Are kea prosocial? Ethology. 2020;126:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12944en_AU
dc.identifier.issn0179-1613en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/214153
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_AU
dc.rights© 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbHen_AU
dc.sourceEthologyen_AU
dc.subjectgiving assistance testen_AU
dc.subjectkeaen_AU
dc.subjectparroten_AU
dc.subjectprosocialityen_AU
dc.subjecttoken exchangeen_AU
dc.titleAre kea prosocial?en_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-09
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage184en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage176en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHeaney, Megan, University of Aucklanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBastos, Amalia P. M., The University of Aucklanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGray, Russell, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTaylor, Alex H., University of Aucklanden_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGray, Russell, u4895948en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor220319 - Social Philosophyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo970122 - Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studiesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5786633xPUB1758en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume126en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1111/eth.12944en_AU
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000484472400001
local.publisher.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Heaney_Are_kea_prosocial%3F__2020.pdf
Size:
943.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format