Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Selecting complementary target taxa for representing terrestrial invertebrate diversity in the Australian seasonal tropics

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Oberprieler, Stefanie
Andersen, Alan N.
Yeates, David K.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

It is usually not practical for invertebrates to be comprehensively included in biodiversity surveys that underpin conservation planning, and so a representative subset of taxa needs to be selected. One approach to representativeness is to select taxa whose patterns of richness and composition are most strongly correlated with those of total invertebrates (i.e. all taxa combined). However, if different groups show very different distribution patterns then ‘total diversity’ cannot be considered as representative of the diversity of invertebrate taxa, and so an alternative approach to achieving representativeness is to base selection on complementarity (i.e. representing the full range of distribution patterns shown by different taxa). We use data on 12 invertebrate families (comprising ants, beetles, flies and spiders) sampled using pitfall traps across 78 sites in a tropical savanna landscape of northern Australia to identify a subset of target taxa (families) to represent their diversity patterns. We use a simple scoring system that incorporates both survey practicality and biological representativeness to compare selection of taxa based on (1) representing ‘total diversity’ and (2) representativeness through complementarity (‘complementary diversity’). Congruence among taxa in terms of both species richness and composition was generally low (ρ < 0.5), suggesting that taxa are poorly representative of each other and thus a complementary approach is required for target taxa selection. The taxa that scored highest in representing ‘complementary diversity’ were very different to those representing ‘total diversity’. To our knowledge, this is the first time that invertebrate representativeness based on ‘total diversity’ and ‘complementary diversity’ have been directly compared. The selected target taxa are specific to our study system, but our simple method for selecting representative invertebrate taxa for conservation planning is widely applicable, including for biodiversity monitoring and environmental impact assessment.

Description

Citation

Source

Ecological Indicators

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31
abcd