Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Valuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluation

dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, Julie
dc.contributor.authorBourke, Siobhan
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jinhu
dc.contributor.authorMulhern, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Claire
dc.contributor.authorKhadka, Jyoti
dc.contributor.authorMilte, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorLancsar, Emily
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-21T23:05:51Z
dc.date.available2023-11-21T23:05:51Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-04
dc.date.updated2022-08-07T10:05:57Z
dc.description.abstractObjective This paper reports on the valuation of the classifcation system for the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) instrument using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with duration with a large sample of older people receiving aged care services. Methods A DCE with 160 choice sets of two quality-of-life state–survival duration combinations blocked into 20 survey versions, with eight choice sets in each version, was designed and administered through an on-line survey to older Australians receiving aged care services in home and via interviewer facilitation with older people in residential aged care settings. Model specifcations investigating preferences with respect to survival duration and interactions between QOL-ACC dimension levels were estimated. Utility weights were developed, with estimated coefcients transformed to the 0 (being dead) to 1 (full health) scale to generate a value set suitable for application in quality assessment and for the calculation of quality-adjusted life-years for use in economic evaluation. Results In total, 953 older people completed the choice experiment with valid responses. The estimation results from econometric model specifcations indicated that utility increased with survival duration and decreased according to qualityof-life impairment levels. An Australian value set (range −0.56 to 1.00) was generated for the calculation of utilities for all QOL-ACC states. Conclusion The QOL-ACC is unique in its focus on measuring and valuing quality of life from the perspective of older people themselves, thereby ensuring that the preferences of aged care service users are the primary focus for quality assessment and economic evaluation.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Linkage Project grant (LP170100664). We are grateful to our aged care partner organisations Helping Hand; ECH; Uniting Agewell; Uniting ACT NSW; Presbyterian Aged Care and the Caring Futures Institute at Flinders University for their additional fnancial and in-kind contributions.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1179-2027en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/307345
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_AU
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP170100664en_AU
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourcePharmacoEconomicsen_AU
dc.titleValuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluationen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1079en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1069en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBourke, Siobhan, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLi, Jinhu, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLancsar, Emily, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.description.notesImported from Springer Natureen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu1149537xPUB8
local.identifier.citationvolume40en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s40273-022-01158-2en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://link.springer.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s40273-022-01158-2.pdf
Size:
871.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: