Valuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluation
| dc.contributor.author | Ratcliffe, Julie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bourke, Siobhan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Jinhu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mulhern, Brendan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hutchinson, Claire | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khadka, Jyoti | |
| dc.contributor.author | Milte, Rachel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lancsar, Emily | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-21T23:05:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-21T23:05:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-08-04 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2022-08-07T10:05:57Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective This paper reports on the valuation of the classifcation system for the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) instrument using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with duration with a large sample of older people receiving aged care services. Methods A DCE with 160 choice sets of two quality-of-life state–survival duration combinations blocked into 20 survey versions, with eight choice sets in each version, was designed and administered through an on-line survey to older Australians receiving aged care services in home and via interviewer facilitation with older people in residential aged care settings. Model specifcations investigating preferences with respect to survival duration and interactions between QOL-ACC dimension levels were estimated. Utility weights were developed, with estimated coefcients transformed to the 0 (being dead) to 1 (full health) scale to generate a value set suitable for application in quality assessment and for the calculation of quality-adjusted life-years for use in economic evaluation. Results In total, 953 older people completed the choice experiment with valid responses. The estimation results from econometric model specifcations indicated that utility increased with survival duration and decreased according to qualityof-life impairment levels. An Australian value set (range −0.56 to 1.00) was generated for the calculation of utilities for all QOL-ACC states. Conclusion The QOL-ACC is unique in its focus on measuring and valuing quality of life from the perspective of older people themselves, thereby ensuring that the preferences of aged care service users are the primary focus for quality assessment and economic evaluation. | en_AU |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Linkage Project grant (LP170100664). We are grateful to our aged care partner organisations Helping Hand; ECH; Uniting Agewell; Uniting ACT NSW; Presbyterian Aged Care and the Caring Futures Institute at Flinders University for their additional fnancial and in-kind contributions. | en_AU |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1179-2027 | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/307345 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_AU | en_AU |
| dc.provenance | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. | en_AU |
| dc.publisher | Springer International Publishing | en_AU |
| dc.relation | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP170100664 | en_AU |
| dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2022 | en_AU |
| dc.rights.license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License | en_AU |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_AU |
| dc.source | PharmacoEconomics | en_AU |
| dc.title | Valuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluation | en_AU |
| dc.type | Journal article | en_AU |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | en_AU |
| local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 1079 | en_AU |
| local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 1069 | en_AU |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Bourke, Siobhan, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University | en_AU |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Li, Jinhu, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University | en_AU |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Lancsar, Emily, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University | en_AU |
| local.description.notes | Imported from Springer Nature | en_AU |
| local.identifier.ariespublication | u1149537xPUB8 | |
| local.identifier.citationvolume | 40 | en_AU |
| local.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s40273-022-01158-2 | en_AU |
| local.publisher.url | https://link.springer.com/ | en_AU |
| local.type.status | Published Version | en_AU |
Downloads
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- s40273-022-01158-2.pdf
- Size:
- 871.19 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: