Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Aligning evidence generation and use across health, development, and environment

dc.contributor.authorTallis, H
dc.contributor.authorKreis, Katharine
dc.contributor.authorOlander, Lydia
dc.contributor.authorRingler, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorAmeyaw, David
dc.contributor.authorBorsuk, Mark E
dc.contributor.authorFletschner, Diana
dc.contributor.authorGame, Edward
dc.contributor.authorGilligan, Daniel O
dc.contributor.authorJeuland, Marc
dc.contributor.authorWu, Joyce
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-10T01:10:06Z
dc.date.available2023-10-10T01:10:06Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2022-08-07T08:19:13Z
dc.description.abstractAlthough health, development, and environment challenges are interconnected, evidence remains fractured across sectors due to methodological and conceptual differences in research and practice. Aligned methods are needed to support Sustainable Development Goal advances and similar agendas. The Bridge Collaborative, an emergent research-practice collaboration, presents principles and recommendations that help harmonize methods for evidence generation and use. Recommendations were generated in the context of designing and evaluating evidence of impact for interventions related to five global challenges (stabilizing the global climate, making food production sustainable, decreasing air pollution and respiratory disease, improving sanitation and water security, and solving hunger and malnutrition) and serve as a starting point for further iteration and testing in a broader set of contexts and disciplines. We adopted six principles and emphasize three methodological recommendations: (1) creation of compatible results chains, (2) consideration of all relevant types of evidence, and (3) evaluation of strength of evidence using a unified rubric. We provide detailed suggestions for how these recommendations can be applied in practice, streamlining efforts to apply multi-objective approaches and/or synthesize evidence in multidisciplinary or transdisciplinary teams. These recommendations advance the necessary process of reconciling existing evidence standards in health, development, and environment, and initiate a common basis for integrated evidence generation and use in research, practice, and policy design.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies, Arcadia, the Gund Institute for Environment, the Growing Forward Two Program (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) and a NatureNet Science Fellowship. We thank Barrett Brown for masterful facilitation of a workshop that generated some of this paper’s content.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1877-3435en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/301845
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.rights© 2019 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licenceen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainabilityen_AU
dc.titleAligning evidence generation and use across health, development, and environmenten_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage93en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage81en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTallis, H, The Nature Conservancyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKreis, Katharine, PATHen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationOlander, Lydia, Duke Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRingler, Claudia, International Food Policy Research Instituteen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAmeyaw, David, International Center for Evaluation and Developmenten_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBorsuk, Mark E, Duke Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationFletschner, Diana, Landesa Center for Women's Land Rightsen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGame, Edward, University of Queenslanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGilligan, Daniel O, International Food Policy Research Instituteen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationJeuland, Marc, Duke Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWu, Joyce, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidWu, Joyce, u4629642en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor441000 - Sociologyen_AU
local.identifier.absfor420600 - Public healthen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5786633xPUB1076en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume39en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cosust.2019.09.004en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85072852848
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000502823600012
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1877343518301374-main.pdf
Size:
529.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
abcd