Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Comparison of the effects of genetic and environmental risk factors on in situ and invasive ductal breast cancer

dc.contributor.authorReeves, Gillian K
dc.contributor.authorPirie, Kirstin
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Jane
dc.contributor.authorBull, Diana
dc.contributor.authorBeral, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorMillion Women Study, Collaborators
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Emily
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:28:25Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T11:08:49Z
dc.description.abstractLittle is known about the etiology of in situ ductal breast cancer (DCIS) or what influences its possible progression to invasive ductal disease. Comparison of risk factors for DCIS and invasive ductal cancer may throw some light on these issues. We estimated relative risks for DCIS and invasive ductal breast cancer according to 12 genetic and eight environmental risk factors among 1.1 million postmenopausal women in a large prospective UK study. There was no strong evidence of a different association with DCIS versus invasive ductal cancer for any of the 12 susceptibility loci examined. We also found similar associations of age at menarche, age at first birth, parity, age at menopause, family history of breast cancer and use of hormone replacement therapy with DCIS and invasive ductal cancer. Only body mass index (BMI) showed a clear difference in association in that it was positively associated with the risk of invasive ductal cancer but not DCIS (RRs per 5 kg/m 2 = 1.20 and 1.01, respectively; p-value for heterogeneity = 0.002). The very similar risk factor profiles observed here for DCIS and invasive ductal cancer suggest that DCIS is a precursor of invasive ductal cancer and most risk factors affect the risk of invasive ductal cancer primarily through their effects on the risk of DCIS. The lack of association between BMI and DCIS suggests a greater influence of BMI on disease progression.
dc.identifier.issn0020-7136
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/54463
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Inc
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Cancer
dc.subjectKeywords: adult; article; body mass; cancer hormone therapy; cancer risk; comparative study; controlled study; disease association; environmental factor; family history; female; genetic risk; genetic susceptibility; human; intraductal carcinoma; invasive carcinoma; alcohol; body mass index; genetic polymorphisms; HRT; in situ ductal breast cancer; invasive ductal breast cancer; mammography; reproductive factors; screening
dc.titleComparison of the effects of genetic and environmental risk factors on in situ and invasive ductal breast cancer
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage8
local.contributor.affiliationReeves, Gillian K, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationPirie, Kirstin, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationGreen, Jane, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationBull, Diana, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationBeral, Valerie, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationMillion Women Study, Collaborators, NHS Breast Screening Centres
local.contributor.affiliationBanks, Emily, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidBanks, Emily, u4106314
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111706 - Epidemiology
local.identifier.absseo970111 - Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4468094xPUB301
local.identifier.citationvolumeOnline 28 NOV 2011
local.identifier.doi10.1002/ijc.26460
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84862534810
local.identifier.thomsonID000305451300044
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Reeves_Comparison_of_the_effects_of_2011.pdf
Size:
854.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format