Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Sequence comparison in computational historical linguistics

dc.contributor.authorList, Johann Mattis
dc.contributor.authorWalworth, Mary
dc.contributor.authorGreenhill, Simon
dc.contributor.authorTresoldi, Tiago
dc.contributor.authorForkel, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-15T23:59:24Z
dc.date.available2021-04-15T23:59:24Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-06
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T11:53:57Z
dc.description.abstractWith increasing amounts of digitally available data from all over the world, manual annotation of cognates in multi-lingual word lists becomes more and more time-consuming in historical linguistics. Using available software packages to pre-process the data prior to manual analysis can drastically speed-up the process of cognate detection. Furthermore, it allows us to get a quick overview on data which have not yet been intensively studied by experts. LingPy is a Python library which provides a large arsenal of routines for sequence comparison in historical linguistics. With LingPy, linguists can not only automatically search for cognates in lexical data, but they can also align the automatically identified words, and output them in various forms, which aim at facilitating manual inspection. In this tutorial, we will briefly introduce the basic concepts behind the algorithms employed by LingPy and then illustrate in concrete workflows how automatic sequence comparison can be applied to multi-lingual word lists. The goal is to provide the readers with all information they need to (1) carry out cognate detection and alignment analyses in LingPy, (2) select the appropriate algorithms for the appropriate task, (3) evaluate how well automatic cognate detection algorithms perform compared to experts, and (4) export their data into various formats useful for additional analyses or data sharing. While basic knowledge of the Python language is useful for all analyses, our tutorial is structured in such a way that scholars with basic knowledge of computing can follow through all steps as well.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the European Research Council Starting Grant ‘Computer-Assisted Language Comparison’ (Grant CALC 715618, J.M.L., T.T.) and the Australian Research Council’s Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language (Australian National University, Grant CE140100041, S.J.G.). As part of the GlottoBank project (http://glottobank.org), this work was further supported by the Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (Jena) and the Royal Society of New Zealand (Marsden Fund, Grant 13-UOA-121).en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2058-4571en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/230001
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_AU
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE140100041en_AU
dc.rights© 2018 The Author(s)en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceJournal of Language Evolutionen_AU
dc.subjecthistorical linguisticsen_AU
dc.subjectcomputer-assisted language comparisonen_AU
dc.subjectPolynesian languagesen_AU
dc.subjectcognate detectionen_AU
dc.subjectphonetic alignmenten_AU
dc.titleSequence comparison in computational historical linguisticsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage144en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage130en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationList, Johann Mattis, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human Historyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWalworth, Mary, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human Historyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGreenhill, Simon, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTresoldi, Tiago, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human Historyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationForkel, Robert, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human Historyen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGreenhill, Simon, u5232172en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor200320 - Pacific Languagesen_AU
local.identifier.absfor200402 - Computational Linguisticsen_AU
local.identifier.absfor200406 - Language in Time and Space (incl. Historical Linguistics, Dialectology)en_AU
local.identifier.absseo970120 - Expanding Knowledge in Languages, Communication and Cultureen_AU
local.identifier.absseo950599 - Understanding Past Societies not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4485658xPUB1416en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume3en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1093/jole/lzy006en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85057793884
local.publisher.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_List_Sequence_comparison_in_2018.pdf
Size:
1.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format