Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Rights, proportionality, and process in EU counterterrorism lawmaking

dc.contributor.authorde Londras, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorTregidga, Jasmin
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-16T03:46:01Z
dc.date.available2024-09-16T03:46:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2024-04-14T08:15:37Z
dc.description.abstractProportionality is a key principle of EU law. However, in spite of procedural requirements intended to ensure the full integration of proportionality as a design principle in EU law, the European Union continues to pass disproportionate counterterrorism laws. If proportionality is a fundamental constitutional principle of the European Union, and if lawmaking processes at EU level have been designed expressly with this in mind, then why do the EU's counterterrorism laws consistently raise issues of disproportionate interference with rights? Taking as a case study the passage of the EU Directive on Combating Terrorism, this article argues that at least part of the answer lies in the curtailment and adjustment, in the counterterrorism field, of lawmaking processes that are designed to be participatory, evidence-based, and informed by proportionality.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1474-2640
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733717289
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.rights© 2021 The authors
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Constitutional Law
dc.titleRights, proportionality, and process in EU counterterrorism lawmaking
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage693
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage665
local.contributor.affiliationde Londras, Fiona, ANU College of Law, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationTregidga, Jasmin, Cardiff University
local.contributor.authoruidde Londras, Fiona, u1085570
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor480703 - Domestic human rights law
local.identifier.absfor480307 - International humanitarian and human rights law
local.identifier.absfor480304 - European Union law
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB28016
local.identifier.citationvolume19
local.identifier.doi10.1093/icon/moab047
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85126517780
local.publisher.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/
local.type.statusPublished Version
publicationvolume.volumeNumber19

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
moab047.pdf
Size:
290.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd