Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A songbird mimics different heterospecific alarm calls in response to different types of threat

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Igic, Branislav
Magrath, Robert D

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

Birds frequently mimic other species' alarm calls, but the type of information conveyed to receivers, and therefore the function of mimetic alarm calls, is often unknown. Alarm calls can convey predator-specific information that influences how receivers respond: aerial alarms signal the presence of flying predators and provoke receivers to flee, whereas mobbing alarm calls signal the presence of less dangerous predators and provoke receivers to mob. The function of mimetic alarm calls may therefore depend on the type of heterospecific alarm calls mimicked. We examined the use of alarm call mimicry by brown thornbills (Acanthiza pusilla) across different contexts of danger: terrestrial threat, aerial threat, when captured by a predator and during nest attack. Thornbills were most likely to include mimetic alarm calls among their vocalizations when captured and during nest attack, less likely in response to terrestrial and aerial predator threats, and least likely in the absence of any threat. Furthermore, the type of danger affected the type of mimetic alarm calls used: thornbills mimicked mobbing alarm calls in response to terrestrial threat and aerial alarm calls in response to aerial threat but also during capture and nest attack where no aerial danger was present. We suggest that mimicking predator-appropriate heterospecific alarm calls in response to aerial and terrestrial threats may facilitate interspecific alarm communication with other prey species, whereas mimicking heterospecific aerial alarm calls in the absence of aerial predators might deceptively startle predators to release captured callers or offspring when attacked.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Behavioral Ecology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31
abcd