Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Ontology Search: An Empirical Evaluation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Butt, Anila
Haller, Armin
Xie, Lexing

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

Much of the recent work in Semantic Search is concerned with addressing the challenge of finding entities in the growing Web of Data. However, alongside this growth, there is a significant increase in the availability of ontologies that can be used to describe these entities. Whereas several methods have been proposed in Semantic Search to rank entities based on a keyword query, little work has been published on search and ranking of resources in ontologies. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to propose a benchmark suite for ontology search. The benchmark suite, named CBRBench1, includes a collection of ontologies that was retrieved by crawling a seed set of ontology URIs derived from prefix.cc and a set of queries derived from a real query log from the Linked Open Vocabularies search engine. Further, it includes the results for the ideal ranking of the concepts in the ontology collection for the identified set of query terms which was established based on the opinions of ten ontology engineering experts.We compared this ideal ranking with the top-k results retrieved by eight state-of-the-art ranking algorithms that we have implemented and calculated the precision at k, the mean average precision and the discounted cumulative gain to determine the best performing ranking model. Our study shows that content-based ranking models outperform graph-based ranking models for most queries on the task of ranking concepts in ontologies. However, as the performance of the ranking models on ontologies is still far inferior to the performance of state-of-the-art algorithms on the ranking of documents based on a keyword query, we put forward four recommendations that we believe can significantly improve the accuracy of these ranking models when searching for resources in ontologies.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2037-12-31
abcd