Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Risk of neurodevelopmental impairment for outborn extremely preterm infants in an Australian regional network

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Mahoney, Kate
Bajuk, Barbara
Oei, Ju Lee
Lui, Kei
ABDEL-LATIF, Mohamed E.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2-3 years in extremely premature outborn and inborn infants. DESIGN Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING Geographically defined area of New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) served by a network of 10 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). PATIENTS All premature infants <29 weeks gestation born between 1998 and 2004 in the setting. INTERVENTION At 2-3 years, corrected age, 1473 children were assessed with either the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales (GMDS) or the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-II). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Moderate/severe functional disability (FD) defined as: developmental delay (GMDS general quotient (GQ) or BSID-II mental developmental index (MDI)) > 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean; cerebral palsy (CP) requiring aids; sensorineural or conductive deafness (requiring amplification); or bilateral blindness (visual acuity <6/60 in better eye). RESULTS At 2-3 years, moderate/severe functional disability does not appear to be significantly different between outborn and inborn infants (adjusted OR 0.782; 95% CI 0.424-1.443). However, there were a significant number of outborn infants lost to follow up (23.3% versus 42.9%). CONCLUSION In this cohort, at 2-3 years follow up neurodevelopmental outcome does not appear to be significantly different between outborn and inborn infants. These results should be interpreted with caution given the limitation of this study.

Description

Citation

Source

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until