Mixed strategies and preference for randomization in games with ambiguity averse agents
Abstract
We study the use of mixed strategies in games by ambiguity averse agents with a preference for randomization. Applying the decision theoretic model of Saito (2015) to games, we establish that the set of rationalizable strategies grows larger as preference for randomization weakens. An agent's preference for randomization is partially observable: given the behavior of an agent in a game, we can determine an upper bound on the strength of randomization preference for that agent. Notably, data in previous experiments on ambiguity aversion in games is not consistent with a maximal preference for randomization for approximately 30% of subjects.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Journal of Economic Theory
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Creative Commons Attribution licence
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description