Open Research will be updating the system on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, from 8:15 to 9:00 AM. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

La dette souveraine, les banques centrales et le droit des finances publiques dans la tradition de Westminster

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bateman, Will

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Mare et Martin

Abstract

Anglophone analyses of public finance law conventionally focus on three topics: taxation, appropriation (the national budget process and legislation), and audit. Within the Westminster tradition, those topics are collected in the idea of 'parliamentary control of public money': a concept embedded in constitutional thought by AV dicey at the end of the 19th century, and repeated and developed by influential jurists through the 20th and into the 21st century. Parliamentary control of public finance, so it goes, is premised on twin constitutional pillars: parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law. A blinkered focus on those three core public finance activities (tax, appropriation and audit) has obscured the importance of other tectonic aspects of the financial and economic profile of sovereign governments: sovereign debt and monetary authority. For the most part, those two subject matters have been neglected in public law and constitutional scholarship in the Anglophone world. There are few if any major engagements with the legal framework of sovereign debt markets, or the statutory integration of central banking into the mechanisms and institutions of public finance. This chapter seeks to fill those gaps in the intellectual fabric of legal and constitutional studies of public finance in the common law tradition. Part 1 will explore the basic constitutional model of Westminster public finance informed by an understanding of sovereign debt markets and central banking up to the 20th century. Part 2 will carry the legal and institutional review of sovereign borrowing and central banking into the modern British state. Part 3 will then explain the development of similar but distinct legal models of public finance and financial constitutionalism in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The Chapter will close by observing the complexities of viewing core constitutional concepts through a public financial lens. Throughout, the chapter will focus on the legal and constitutional structure of parliamentary supply and appropriation, sovereign borrowing and central banking.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Les finances publiques des pays anglo-saxons

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads

abcd