Open Research will be unavailable from 10.15am - 11am on Saturday 14th March 2026 AEDT due to scheduled maintenance.
 

Breastfeeding and infant care as "sexed" care work: reconsideration of the three Rs to enable women's rights, economic empowerment, nutrition and health

dc.contributor.authorGribble, Karleen
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Julie
dc.contributor.authorGammeltoft, Tine
dc.contributor.authorUlep, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorvan Esterik, Penny
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Lyn
dc.contributor.authorPereira-Kotze, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorChopra, Deepta
dc.contributor.authorSiregar, Adiatma
dc.contributor.authorHajizadeh, Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorMathisen, Roger
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-12T21:50:36Z
dc.date.available2024-11-12T21:50:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.updated2024-01-21T07:15:37Z
dc.description.abstractWomen’s1 lifelong health and nutrition status is intricately related to their reproductive history, including the number and spacing of their pregnancies and births, and for how long and how intensively they breastfeed their children. In turn, women’s reproductive biology is closely linked to their social roles and situation, including regarding economic disadvantage and disproportionate unpaid work. Recognizing, as well as reducing and redistributing women’s care and domestic work (known as the ‘Three Rs’), is an established framework for addressing women’s inequitable unpaid care work. However, the care work of breastfeeding presents a dilemma, and is even a divisive issue, for advocates of women’s empowerment, because reducing breastfeeding and replacing it with commercial milk formula risks harming women’s and children’s health. It is therefore necessary for the interaction between women’s reproductive biology and infant care role to be recognized in order to support women’s human rights and enable governments to implement economic, employment and other policies to empower women. In this paper, we argue that breastfeeding–like childbirth–is reproductive work that should not be reduced and cannot sensibly be directly redistributed to fathers or others. Rather, we contend that the Three Rs agenda should be reconceptualized to isolate breastfeeding as ‘sexed’ care work that should be supported rather than reduced with action taken to avoid undermining breastfeeding. This means that initiatives toward gender equality should be assessed against their impact on women’s ability to breastfeed. With this reconceptualization, adjustments are also needed to key global economic institutions and national statistical systems to appropriately recognize the value of this work. Additional structural supports such as maternity protection and childcare are needed to ensure that childbearing and breastfeeding do not disadvantage women amidst efforts to reduce gender pay gaps and gender economic inequality. Distinct policy interventions are also required to facilitate fathers’ engagement in enabling and supporting breastfeeding through sharing the other unpaid care work associated with parents’ time-consuming care responsibilities, for both infants and young children and related household work.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2296-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733724493
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.publisherFrontiers
dc.rights© 2023 The authors
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licence
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceFrontiers in Public Health
dc.titleBreastfeeding and infant care as "sexed" care work: reconsideration of the three Rs to enable women's rights, economic empowerment, nutrition and health
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.contributor.affiliationGribble, Karleen, University of Western Sydney
local.contributor.affiliationSmith, Julie, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationGammeltoft, Tine, University of Copenhagen
local.contributor.affiliationUlep, Valerie, Philippine Institute for Development Studies, Quezon City, Philippines
local.contributor.affiliationvan Esterik, Penny, York University
local.contributor.affiliationCraig, Lyn, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationPereira-Kotze, Catherine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
local.contributor.affiliationChopra, Deepta, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
local.contributor.affiliationSiregar, Adiatma, Center for Economics and Development Studies, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
local.contributor.affiliationHajizadeh, Mohammad, Dalhousie University
local.contributor.affiliationMathisen, Roger, Alive and Thrive, FHI 360/FHI Solutions, Hanoi, Vietnam
local.contributor.authoruidSmith, Julie, u1473103
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor420605 - Preventative health care
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB44551
local.identifier.citationvolume11
local.identifier.doi10.3389/fpubh.2023.1181229
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85174950535
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/
local.type.statusPublished Version
publicationvolume.volumeNumber11

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fpubh-11-1181229.pdf
Size:
782.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format