Problems with the coronial determination of "suicide"
Date
2015
Authors
Tait, Gordon
Carpenter, Belinda
De Leo, Diego
Tatz, Colin
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Brunner - Routledge (US)
Abstract
After over 100 years of constant dissatisfaction with the accuracy of suicide data, this
paper suggests that the problem may actually lie with the category of suicide itself. In almost all previous
research, ‘suicide’ is taken to be a self-evidently valid category of death, not an object of study
in its own right. Instead, the focus in this paper is upon the presupposition that how a social fact
like suicide is counted depends upon norms for its governmental regulation, leading to a reciprocal
relationship between social norms and statistical norms. Since this relationship is centred almost
entirely in the coroner’s office, this paper examines governmental, definitional and categorisational
issues relating to how coroners reach findings of suicide. The intention of this paper is to contribute
to international debates over how suicide can best be conceptualised and adjudged.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Mortality
Type
Journal article
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31
Downloads
File
Description