Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Assessing the accuracy of blending Landsat-MODIS surface reflectances in two landscapes with contrasting spatial and temporal dynamics: A framework for algorithm selection

dc.contributor.authorEmelyanova, Irina V.
dc.contributor.authorMcVicar, Tim R
dc.contributor.authorVan Niel, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.authorLi , Ling Tao
dc.contributor.authorVan Dijk, Albert
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:15:30Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:53:35Z
dc.description.abstractBlending algorithms model land cover change by using highly resolved spatial data from one sensor and highly resolved temporal data from another. Because the data are not usually observed concurrently, unaccounted spatial and temporal variances cause error in blending algorithms, yet, to date, there has been no definitive assessment of algorithm performance against spatial and temporal variances. Our objectives were to: (i) evaluate the accuracy of two advanced blending algorithms (STARFM and ESTARFM) and two simple benchmarking algorithms in two landscapes with contrasting spatial and temporal variances; and (ii) synthesise the spatial and temporal conditions under which the algorithms performed best. Landsat-like images were simulated on 27 dates in total using the nearest temporal cloud-free Landsat-MODIS pairs to the simulation date, one before and one after. RMSD, bias, and r2 estimates between simulated and observed Landsat images were calculated, and overall variance of Landsat and MODIS datasets were partitioned into spatial and temporal components. Assessment was performed over the whole study site, and for specific land covers. Results addressing objective (i) were that: ESTARFM did not always produce lower errors than STARFM; STARFM and ESTARFM did not always produce lower errors than simple benchmarking algorithms; and land cover spatial and temporal variances were strongly associated with algorithm performance. Results addressing objective (ii) indicated ESTARFM was superior where/when spatial variance was dominant; and STARFM was superior where/when temporal variance was dominant. We proposed a framework for selecting blending algorithms based on partitioning variance into the spatial and temporal components and suggested that comparing Landsat and MODIS spatial and temporal variances was a practical method to determine if, and when, MODIS could add value for blending.
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/64685
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceRemote Sensing of Environment
dc.subjectKeywords: Algorithm performance; Algorithm selection; Benchmarking algorithm; ESTARFM; Spatial and temporal variances; Spatial temporals; STARFM; Surface reflectance; Benchmarking; Blending; Errors; Fusion reactions; Landforms; Radiometers; Algorithms; accuracy ass ESTARFM; Fusion; Landsat-MODIS blending; Spatial-temporal variance; STARFM
dc.titleAssessing the accuracy of blending Landsat-MODIS surface reflectances in two landscapes with contrasting spatial and temporal dynamics: A framework for algorithm selection
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage209
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage193
local.contributor.affiliationEmelyanova, Irina V., CSIRO
local.contributor.affiliationMcVicar, Tim R, CSIRO Land and Water
local.contributor.affiliationVan Niel, Thomas G., CSIRO Land and Water
local.contributor.affiliationLi , Ling Tao, CSIRO Land and Water
local.contributor.affiliationVan Dijk, Albert, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidVan Dijk, Albert, u5250651
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor090905 - Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
local.identifier.absseo960913 - Water Allocation and Quantification
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4279067xPUB981
local.identifier.citationvolume133
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.007
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84875063135
local.identifier.thomsonID000317942100016
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Emelyanova_Assessing_the_accuracy_of_2013.pdf
Size:
3.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format