Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Public accountability of public prosecutions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Yang, Kenny

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Murdoch University

Abstract

The role of the Prosecutor and the exercise of Prosecutorial discretion can have an enormous impact on the outcome of criminal proceedings. The exercise of Prosecutorial discretion is, however, often secretive and misunderstood. There have been concerns that a lack of accountability and transparency can result in a fertile bed for corruption. This article considers the development of the prosecution system in Australia. It analyses the discretion that the Prosecutor wields and examines Australian attempts at safeguarding this discretion. It points out the problems with the Australian system of prosecution and suggests that there is room for greater public accountability of the Prosecutor's role. In the search for a solution to the Prosecutorial conundrum, the article examines the Japanese model of "democratic" public prosecution to see if such a system could be adopted in Australia.

Description

Citation

Source

Murdoch University Law Review 20.1 (2013): 28-75

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until