Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Genetic factors in threatened species recovery plans on three continents

dc.contributor.authorPierson, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorCoates, David J.
dc.contributor.authorOostermeijer, J. Gerard B.
dc.contributor.authorBeissinger, Steven R.
dc.contributor.authorBragg, Jason
dc.contributor.authorSunnucks, Paul
dc.contributor.authorSchumaker, Nathan H.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T22:55:21Z
dc.date.available2018-11-29T22:55:21Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.updated2018-11-29T08:06:05Z
dc.description.abstractAround the world, recovery planning for threatened species is being applied in an attempt to stem the current extinction crisis. Genetic factors linked to small population processes (eg inbreeding, loss of genetic diversity) play a key role in species viability. We examined how often genetic factors are considered in threatened species recovery planning. We selected recent species recovery plans from Europe (n = 110), North America (the US only; n = 100), and Australia (n = 108), and reviewed three broad categories of genetic data they address: population-genetic, fitness-related, and life-history data. We found that the host country, taxonomic group to which the species belonged, and several proposed management actions were important predictors of the inclusion of genetic factors. Notably, species recovery plans from the US were more likely to include genetic issues, probably due to legislative requirements. We recommend an international standard, similar to an IUCN Red List framework, that requires explicit consideration of genetic aspects of long-term viability.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1540-9295
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/153142
dc.publisherEcological Society of America
dc.sourceFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
dc.titleGenetic factors in threatened species recovery plans on three continents
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue8
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage440
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage433
local.contributor.affiliationPierson, Jennifer, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationCoates, David J., Department of Parks and Wildlife
local.contributor.affiliationOostermeijer, J. Gerard B., University of Amsterdam
local.contributor.affiliationBeissinger, Steven R., University of California
local.contributor.affiliationBragg, Jason, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationSunnucks, Paul, Monash University
local.contributor.affiliationSchumaker, Nathan H., Environment Protection Agency
local.contributor.affiliationYoung, Andrew, CSIRO
local.contributor.authoruidPierson, Jennifer, u5489380
local.contributor.authoruidBragg, Jason, u5239850
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor050100 - ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
local.identifier.absseo960700 - ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, LEGISLATION AND STANDARDS
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB4394
local.identifier.citationvolume14
local.identifier.doi10.1002/fee.1323
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84989838555
local.identifier.thomsonID000386123600014
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Pierson_Genetic_factors_in_threatened_2016.pdf
Size:
1.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd