Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Tubewells and arsenic in Bangladesh: challenging a public health success story

dc.contributor.authorCaldwell, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorCaldwell, John
dc.contributor.authorMitra, S N
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Wayne T
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:12:29Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T23:12:29Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T08:31:44Z
dc.description.abstractBangladesh has seen one of the developing world's great public health successes, the conversion of the drinking water source for 94% of the rural population to 'safe water', in the form of tubewells, with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality from water-borne disease. Now, that success is being endangered by the discovery that 20 million people may be in great danger and another 20 million in lesser danger of being poisoned by arsenic contamination from tubewell water. This article reports findings from the first national probability sample survey of the rural population and a census of tubewells investigating the social, demographic and epidemiological context of the crisis. The survey covered 3780 households containing 20260 people. The tubewell census covered 9174 tubewells. The article presents data on the respondents' history of drinking tubewell water, knowledge of the arsenic problem, identification of arsenicosis, as well as the impact upon them of the national campaign, the testing of tubewells, and their subsequent sources of water. Eighty-seven per cent of households drank water from ordinary tubewells (at most risk from arsenic poisoning) and 7% from deep tubewells. Among males, 47.5% had heard that something may be wrong with tubewell water, compared with 39.6% of females. A much lower proportion (20.6% males, 11.3% females) had heard that the water contained a poison called arsenic. Only about 1.5% of the entire population had stopped using tubewell water. Of survey respondents, 0.5% of males and 0.4% of females reported symptoms consistent with chronic arsenicosis. Suggestions are made for a more effective programme.
dc.identifier.issn1077-3495
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/88081
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Inc
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Population Geography
dc.subjectKeywords: arsenic; drinking water; groundwater; public health; water quality; Bangladesh Arsenic; Bangladesh; Contaminated water; Environmental health; Safe water; Tubewells
dc.titleTubewells and arsenic in Bangladesh: challenging a public health success story
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage38
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage23
local.contributor.affiliationCaldwell, Bruce, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationCaldwell, John, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationMitra, S N, Mitra and Associates
local.contributor.affiliationSmith, Wayne T, University of Newcastle
local.contributor.authoruidCaldwell, Bruce, u8902912
local.contributor.authoruidCaldwell, John, u4045011
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor111706 - Epidemiology
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub17596
local.identifier.citationvolume9
local.identifier.doi10.1002/ijpg.271
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-0037262641
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads