Assessing the robustness of Antarctic temperature reconstructions over the past 2 millennia using pseudoproxy and data assimilation experiments

dc.contributor.authorKlein, François
dc.contributor.authorAbram, Nerilie
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Mark A J
dc.contributor.authorGoosse, Hugues
dc.contributor.authorGoursaud, Sentia
dc.contributor.authorMasson-Delmotte, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorMoy, Andrew D.
dc.contributor.authorNeukom, Raphael
dc.contributor.authorOrsi, Anais
dc.contributor.authorSjolte, Jesper
dc.contributor.authorSteiger, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorStenni, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T03:02:08Z
dc.date.available2020-02-10T03:02:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2019-11-25T07:31:11Z
dc.description.abstractThe Antarctic temperature changes over the past millennia remain more uncertain than in many other continental regions. This has several origins: (1) the number of high-resolution ice cores is small, in particular on the East Antarctic plateau and in some coastal areas in East Antarctica; (2) the short and spatially sparse instrumental records limit the calibration period for reconstructions and the assessment of the methodologies; (3) the link between isotope records from ice cores and local climate is usually complex and dependent on the spatial scales and timescales investigated. Here, we use climate model results, pseudoproxy experiments and data assimilation experiments to assess the potential for reconstructing the Antarctic temperature over the last 2 millennia based on a new database of stable oxygen isotopes in ice cores compiled in the framework of Antarctica2k (Stenni et al., 2017). The well-known covariance between δ18O and temperature is reproduced in the two isotope-enabled models used (ECHAM5/MPI-OM and ECHAM5-wiso), but is generally weak over the different Antarctic regions, limiting the skill of the reconstructions. Furthermore, the strength of the link displays large variations over the past millennium, further affecting the potential skill of temperature reconstructions based on statistical methods which rely on the assumption that the last decades are a good estimate for longer temperature reconstructions. Using a data assimilation technique allows, in theory, for changes in the δ18O–temperature link through time and space to be taken into account. Pseudoproxy experiments confirm the benefits of using data assimilation methods instead of statistical methods that provide reconstructions with unrealistic variances in some Antarctic subregions. They also confirm that the relatively weak link between both variables leads to a limited potential for reconstructing temperature based on δ18O. However, the reconstruction skill is higher and more uniform among reconstruction methods when the reconstruction target is the Antarctic as a whole rather than smaller Antarctic subregions. This consistency between the methods at the large scale is also observed when reconstructing temperature based on the real δ18O regional composites of Stenni et al. (2017). In this case, temperature reconstructions based on data assimilation confirm the long-term cooling over Antarctica during the last millennium, and the later onset of anthropogenic warming compared with the simulations without data assimilation, which is especially visible in West Antarctica. Data assimilation also allows for models and direct observations to be reconciled by reproducing the east–west contrast in the recent temperature trends. This recent warming pattern is likely mostly driven by internal variability given the large spread of individual Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP)/Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) model realizations in simulating it. As in the pseudoproxy framework, the reconstruction methods perform differently at the subregional scale, especially in terms of the variance of the time series produced. While the potential benefits of using a data assimilation method instead of a statistical method have been highlighted in a pseudoproxy framework, the instrumental series are too short to confirm this in a realistic setup.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Belgian Research Action through Interdisciplinary Networks (BRAIN-be) from the Belgian Science Policy Office in the framework of the “East Antarctic surface mass balance in the Anthropocene: observations and multiscale modelling (Mass2Ant)” project (contract no. BR/165/A2/Mass2Ant). Hugues Goosse is the research director within the F.R.S.-FNRS. Nathan J. Steiger is supported by the US National Science Foundation award no. OISE-1743738. Raphael Neukom is supported by the Swiss NSF (grant no. PZ00P2_154802).en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1814-9324en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/201585
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenance© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en_AU
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbHen_AU
dc.rights© Author(s) 2019.en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceClimate of the Pasten_AU
dc.titleAssessing the robustness of Antarctic temperature reconstructions over the past 2 millennia using pseudoproxy and data assimilation experimentsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage684en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage661en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKlein, François, Université catholique de Louvainen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAbram, Nerilie, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCurran, Mark A J, Australian Antarctic Divisionen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGoosse, Hugues, Université catholique de Louvainen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGoursaud, Sentia, CEA Saclayen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMasson-Delmotte, Valerie, Institute Pierre Simon Laplaceen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMoy, Andrew D., Australian Antarctic Divisionen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNeukom, Raphael, University of Bernen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationOrsi, Anais, CEA Saclayen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSjolte, Jesper, Lund Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSteiger, Nathan, Columbia Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationStenni, Barbara, Ca' Foscari University of Veniceen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWerner, Martin, Helmholtz Centre for POlar and Marine Researchen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidAbram, Nerilie, u9718469en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor040105 - Climatology (excl. Climate Change Processes)en_AU
local.identifier.absfor040605 - Palaeoclimatologyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo960304 - Climate Variability (excl. Social Impacts)en_AU
local.identifier.absseo960303 - Climate Change Modelsen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu3102795xPUB1465en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume15en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.5194/cp-15-661-2019en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85064088937
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.egu.eu/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Klein_Assessing_the_robustness_of_2019.pdf
Size:
11.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format