Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Early Australian implement variation : a reduction model

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Hiscock, Peter
Attenbrow, Val

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Science Ltd

Abstract

The composition of lithic assemblages is typically depicted in terms the relative abundance of different implement types. In this paper we hypothesize that the characteristics of early Australian assemblages said to distinguish those types are part of a morphological continuum, and that this continuum is largely explained as a reflection of different levels of reduction. We demonstrate the viability of this perspective at one of the classic sites at which early industries were defined, Capertee 3. The existence of an Australian technology structured around continuous reduction without evidence of ‘‘imposed form’’ reveals that this pattern is widespread and should not be taken to represent an ‘‘archaic’’ approach to stone working. Implications for conventional interpretations of Palaeolithic stone implements are briefly examined.

Description

Citation

Source

Journal of Archaeological Science

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until