Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction

dc.contributor.authorKushnir, Vladyslav
dc.contributor.authorSproule, Beth A
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, John
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-08T00:14:09Z
dc.date.available2021-07-08T00:14:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T10:39:51Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Large-scale distribution efforts of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) have been documented to be cost-effective interventions for increasing smoking quit rates. However, despite nearly a dozen studies evaluating their effectiveness, none have examined whether free NRT provision promotes further primary care help-seeking and the impact that it may have on cessation efforts. Methods In the context of a randomized controlled trial, a secondary analysis was conducted on 1000 adult regular smokers randomized to be mailed a 5-week supply of nicotine patches or to a no intervention control group. Recipients and users of free nicotine patches at an 8 week follow-up were successfully case matched to controls based on age, gender, baseline level of nicotine dependence and intent to quit (n = 201 per group). Differences in physician interaction between the two groups were evaluated at both 8 week and 6 month follow-ups. The impact of physician interaction on self-reported smoking abstinence at each follow-up was also examined. Results Although no differences in physician interaction were noted between groups at the 8 week follow-up, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users reported greater frequency of discussing smoking with their physician (43.9%), as compared to the control group (30.3%) (p = 0.011). Across both groups, over 90% of those that discussed smoking with a physician were encouraged to quit and approximately 70% were provided with additional support. Separate ANOVAs revealed no significant impact of physician interaction on cessation (p > 0.05), regardless of group or follow-up period, however, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users who discussed cessation with a physician had made serious quit attempts at significantly greater rates (72.6%), compared to controls (49.1%) (p = 0.007). Conclusions Irrespective of group, the majority of smokers in the present study did not discuss cessation with their physician. Recipients and users of nicotine patches however, were more likely to discuss smoking with their physician, suggesting that the provision of free NRT particularly to those who are likely to use it may facilitate opportunities for benefits beyond the direct pharmacological effects of the medication.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN:111209)en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/238610
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_AU
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en_AU
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2017 Open Accessen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceBMC Public Healthen_AU
dc.subjectSmoking cessationen_AU
dc.subjectNicotine replacement therapyen_AU
dc.subjectPrimary care physiciansen_AU
dc.subjectTobaccoen_AU
dc.subjectHealth professionalsen_AU
dc.titleImpact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interactionen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage9en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKushnir, Vladyslav, Center for Addiction and Mental Healthen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSproule, Beth A, Centre for Addiction and Mental Healthen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCunningham, John, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidCunningham, John, u5380249en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor111717 - Primary Health Careen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB7279en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume18en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-017-4548-5en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85022007301
local.identifier.thomsonID000405873200001
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpublichealth/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Kushnir_Impact_of_large-scale_2017.pdf
Size:
492.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd