"Friendship, but Bloke-ier": Can Mateship Be Reimagined asan Inclusive Civic Ideal in Australia?
Loading...
Date
Authors
Carlin, Na'ama
Jones, Benjamin
Laugesen, Amanda
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Abstract
In 1999, John Howard attempted to insert the word “mateship” into
the Constitution, arguing that it had been reimagined as an
inclusive national ideal. This article looks at the history and
meaning of mateship, followed by a discussion of contemporary
Australian attitudes towards it. The data we use in this article is
from a voluntary survey (the Australian Mateship Survey)
conducted by the authors, which asked respondents (N = 576)
how they define mateship and how they feel about the term. The
results indicate that a majority think mateship is a key feature of
Australian identity but have concerns when the idea is politicised.
A sizable minority believe the term is gendered and racialised
and, therefore, is not inclusive of all Australians. Further, the
survey suggests that a wide range of opinions exists even among
those who do believe mateship has national significance. Twenty
years after Howard’s attempt to enshrine mateship in the
Constitution, this article suggests that the concept remains too
divisive to serve as a core Australian value.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Journal of Australian Studies
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31