Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Equality and Anti-Discrimination Legislation:An Uneasy Relationship

dc.contributor.authorThornton, Margaret
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T00:54:18Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T00:54:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-01-23T07:19:28Z
dc.description.abstractDespite the rhetoric of equality that infuses anti-discrimination legislation, a close analysis reveals that it is in-equal-ity that is invariably privileged. With reference to the Australian example, this introductory article will show how the paradox is played out at multiple sites in terms of both form and substance, such as through the individualism and confidentiality of the complaint-based mechanism. A striking exclusion from the legislation is the attribute of class, the most significant manifestationof social inequality, which remains ineffable even when it significantly shapes other attributes. The prevailing political backdrop of neoliberalism plays a significant role in promoting ine-quality through competition policy and profit maximisation. Powerful corporations not only endeavour to resist transparency, but they also tend to oppose proactive measures in favour of substantive equality. The contradictions of anti-discrimination legislation thereby sustain in-equality while simultaneously espousing the rhetoric of equal-ity.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0811-5796en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/289358
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis work is under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_AU
dc.publisherThe Federation Pressen_AU
dc.rights© 2021 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licenceen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceLaw in Contexten_AU
dc.subjectEqualityen_AU
dc.subjectanti-discrimination legislationen_AU
dc.subjectneoliberalismen_AU
dc.subjectcorporate poweren_AU
dc.subjectpositive actionen_AU
dc.titleEquality and Anti-Discrimination Legislation:An Uneasy Relationshipen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage26en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage12en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationThornton, Margaret, ANU College of Law, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidThornton, Margaret, u4352908en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor480405 - Law and society and socio-legal researchen_AU
local.identifier.absfor480703 - Domestic human rights lawen_AU
local.identifier.absfor480410 - Legal theory, jurisprudence and legal interpretationen_AU
local.identifier.absseo230112 - Social class and inequalitiesen_AU
local.identifier.absseo230501 - Employment patterns and changeen_AU
local.identifier.absseo230401 - Civil justiceen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5706852xPUB65en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume37en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.26826/law-in-context.v37i2.149en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://journals.latrobe.edu.au/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TMP699104056202341810272.pdf
Size:
408.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: