Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Models and measurement in disability: an international review

dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHarley, David
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:49:24Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T11:32:02Z
dc.description.abstractThis article reviews the theoretical basis and methods for disability measurement. Different methods arise from different theoretical perspectives. Recent efforts to develop a general international disability measure consistent with the social model of disability aim to produce an internationally comparable measure of disability with which to assess the equalisation of opportunities. Such a measure cannot consistently identify disabled people in need of health and social services. Correctly identifying those in need of these services particularly concerns developing countries where government revenues and disability services are severely limited. This review highlights the need for multiple disability measures to meet different purposes of measurement. The Washington Group general measure on disability and Katz's Activities of Daily Living Index are recommended as valid measures of varying functioning level consistent with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
dc.identifier.issn1460-2237
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/26735
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.sourceHealth Policy and Planning: a journal on health in development
dc.subjectKeywords: daily life activity; disability; disabled person; human; international cooperation; review; statistics; theoretical model; Activities of Daily Living; Disability Evaluation; Disabled Persons; Humans; Internationality; Models, Theoretical ADLs; disability measurement; Disability models; Washington Group general disability measure
dc.titleModels and measurement in disability: an international review
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage8
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationPalmer, Michael, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationHarley, David, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidPalmer, Michael, u4283356
local.contributor.authoruidHarley, David, u3881428
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111706 - Epidemiology
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4971216xPUB46
local.identifier.citationvolumeOnline
local.identifier.doi10.1093/heapol/czr047
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84864544941
local.identifier.thomsonID000306930400001
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Palmer_Models_and_measurement_in_2011.pdf
Size:
84.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format