Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Did the 2006 amendments downgrade non-parents? Aldridge v Keaton

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorChisholm, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:22:19Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2015-12-09T09:02:43Z
dc.identifier.issn0817-623X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/52625
dc.publisherButterworths
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Family Law
dc.titleDid the 2006 amendments downgrade non-parents? Aldridge v Keaton
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage123
local.contributor.affiliationChisholm, Richard, ANU College of Law, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidChisholm, Richard, u4690602
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor180113 - Family Law
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4046278xPUB251
local.identifier.citationvolume24
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Chisholm_Did_the_2006_amendments_2010.pdf
Size:
76.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

ANU Research Publications

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS